MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Prediction of Cem Ilkel [578th] vs Seongchan Hong [305th] Head-to-Head At The

By Wojtek Kolan

Head-2-Head: Ilkel 1 - 0 Hong

They have played 3 sets in total, with Ilkel winning 2 and Hong winning 1. The last match between Ilkel and Hong was at the Turkey F7 (Antalya), 24-02-2017, Quarterfinals, Hard with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 6-7(3) 6-4 7-5.

Players Head-To-Head Match Wins
Cem Ilkel 1
Seongchan Hong 0
Ilkel vs Hong H2H Profile
Ilkel Stats Hong
79% (26-7) YTD Win/Loss 0% (0-0)
1 Head-to-Head 0
578 Ranking 305
144 Highest Rank 139
29 Age 27
R Plays R
7 Titles 15
57% (434-333) Career Total W/L 62% (265-162)
$225,530 Career Prize Money $178,045
2 YTD Titles 0
1 Hard H2H 0
0 Clay H2H 0
0 Indoor H2H 0
0 Grass H2H 0

Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)

Ilkel VS Hong H2H Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-7(3) 6-4 7-5
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
Seongchan Hong
65% ( 74 of 113)
1st Serve %
58% ( 52 of 90)
6
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
74% ( 55 of 74)
1st Serve Won
75% ( 39 of 52)
49% ( 19 of 39)
2nd Serve Won
61% ( 23 of 38)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
22% ( 2 of 9)
35% ( 39 of 113)
Rtn Points Won
31% ( 28 of 90)
102
Total Points Won
101

Ilkel VS Hong H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Ilkel Vs Hong H2H Stats
Cem Ilkel Ilkel Stats Seongchan Hong Hong
1 H2H Matches 0
2 Sets Won 1
19 Games Won 16
6 Aces (Total) 4
0 Total Double Faults 2
2:35:0 Average Match Time 2:35:0
65% (74/113) 1st Serve % 58% (52/90)
74% (55/74) 1st Serve Win % 75% (39/52)
49% (19/39) 2nd Serve Win % 61% (23/38)
67% (4/6) Break Points Won % (Total) 22% (2/9)
31% (28/90) Return Points Win % 35% (39/113)
100% (1/1) Best of 3 Sets Win % 0% (0/1)
0% (0/0) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0)
0% (0/1) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 100% (1/1)
100% (1/1) Deciding Set Win % 0% (0/1)
0% (0/0) 1st Set Won, Won Match 0% (1/0)
0% (0/0) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 100% (1/1)
100% (1/1) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 0% (0/0)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Cem Ilkel vs Seongchan Hong Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Ilkel 1 - 0 Hong

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ilkel has won 46.28% of points on their second serve, while Hong has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ilkel, in recent form, has won 40.37% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hong has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.96% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Ilkel has saved 51.26% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hong has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Ilkel has won 58.62% of matches played (W/L 34/ 24), with Hong winning 56.76% (W/L 21/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 284/ 177), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9). Hong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 233/ 122), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 8).
  • Player level: In the last year, Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 70% of matches (W/L 28/ 12), where as Hong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.87% of matches (W/L 14/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ilkel winning 1 times and Hong being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Ilkel winning 2 and Hong winning 1. The last match between Ilkel and Hong was at the Turkey F7 (Antalya), 24-02-2017, Quarterfinals, Hard with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 6-7(3) 6-4 7-5.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:35:0.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Ilkel and Hong have played a deciding set 1 times, with Ilkel winning 1 times and Hong 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Ilkel winning 0, and Hong 1.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ilkel has played against opponents with an average rank of 432.71 while Hong has played against players with an average rank of 245.62.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ilkel has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hong has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
  • Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Ilkel has converted 36.44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hong has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)

Cem Ilkel vs Seongchan Hong Best Odds For The Match

Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
QF
cross
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Cem Ilkel
61% ( 47 of 77)
1st Serve %
76% ( 62 of 82)
11
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72% ( 34 of 47)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 39 of 62)
63% ( 19 of 30)
2nd Serve Won
60% ( 12 of 20)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
31% ( 24 of 77)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 31 of 82)
84
Total Points Won
75
L
6-1 4-6 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
Matteo Lavizzari
58% ( 57 of 98)
1st Serve %
60% ( 59 of 99)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
72% ( 41 of 57)
1st Serve Won
80% ( 47 of 59)
56% ( 23 of 41)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 17 of 40)
33% ( 2 of 6)
Break Points Won
38% ( 3 of 8)
35% ( 34 of 98)
Rtn Points Won
35% ( 35 of 99)
99
Total Points Won
98
W
6-4 2-6 7-6(2) H2H
R1
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
David Poljak
61% ( 62 of 101)
1st Serve %
62% ( 68 of 110)
9
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
74% ( 46 of 62)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 47 of 68)
64% ( 25 of 39)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 22 of 42)
33% ( 3 of 9)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
30% ( 30 of 101)
Rtn Points Won
37% ( 41 of 110)
112
Total Points Won
99
W
6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-3 H2H
R2
cross
Mert Alkaya
Player
Cem Ilkel
57% ( 35 of 61)
1st Serve %
53% ( 31 of 58)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69% ( 24 of 35)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 20 of 31)
50% ( 13 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
37% ( 10 of 27)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
39% ( 24 of 61)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 28 of 58)
65
Total Points Won
54
L
6-3 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
Henri Haupt
31% ( 4 of 13)
1st Serve %
73% ( 11 of 15)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
100% ( 4 of 4)
1st Serve Won
36% ( 4 of 11)
89% ( 8 of 9)
2nd Serve Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
100% ( 2 of 2)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
8% ( 1 of 13)
Rtn Points Won
67% ( 10 of 15)
22
Total Points Won
6
W
5-1 ret. H2H
QF
cross
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Cem Ilkel
70% ( 42 of 60)
1st Serve %
56% ( 46 of 82)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
76% ( 32 of 42)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 30 of 46)
44% ( 8 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 16 of 36)
23% ( 3 of 13)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
33% ( 20 of 60)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 36 of 82)
76
Total Points Won
66
L
6-4 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
Tuncay Duran
68% ( 50 of 74)
1st Serve %
77% ( 67 of 87)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
62% ( 31 of 50)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 39 of 67)
75% ( 18 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
55% ( 11 of 20)
33% ( 3 of 9)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
34% ( 25 of 74)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 37 of 87)
86
Total Points Won
75
W
3-6 6-2 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
Jordan Correia Passos Do Carmo
65% ( 48 of 74)
1st Serve %
62% ( 53 of 86)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
73% ( 35 of 48)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 34 of 53)
54% ( 14 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 13 of 33)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
34% ( 25 of 74)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 39 of 86)
88
Total Points Won
72
W
6-2 4-6 6-2 H2H
F
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
Pepijn Bastiaansen
64% ( 43 of 67)
1st Serve %
66% ( 35 of 53)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67% ( 29 of 43)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 22 of 35)
58% ( 14 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 8 of 18)
60% ( 3 of 5)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
36% ( 24 of 67)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 23 of 53)
66
Total Points Won
54
W
6-3 6-4 H2H
SF
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
Matyas Fuele
57% ( 27 of 47)
1st Serve %
49% ( 23 of 47)
10
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
81% ( 22 of 27)
1st Serve Won
48% ( 11 of 23)
55% ( 11 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 10 of 24)
83% ( 5 of 6)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
30% ( 14 of 47)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 26 of 47)
59
Total Points Won
35
W
6-0 6-4 H2H

Seongchan Hong Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
QF
cross
Yosuke Watanuki
Player
Seongchan Hong
57% ( 33 of 58)
1st Serve %
74% ( 46 of 62)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
76% ( 25 of 33)
1st Serve Won
48% ( 22 of 46)
60% ( 15 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
69% ( 11 of 16)
80% ( 4 of 5)
Break Points Won
17% ( 1 of 6)
31% ( 18 of 58)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 29 of 62)
69
Total Points Won
51
L
6-2 7-5 H2H
Q1
cross
Seongchan Hong
Player
Illya Marchenko
66% ( 42 of 64)
1st Serve %
56% ( 40 of 72)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
64% ( 27 of 42)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 28 of 40)
77% ( 17 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
53% ( 17 of 32)
75% ( 3 of 4)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
31% ( 20 of 64)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 27 of 72)
71
Total Points Won
65
W
7-6(5) 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Seongchan Hong
50% ( 25 of 50)
1st Serve %
49% ( 24 of 49)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
72% ( 18 of 25)
1st Serve Won
75% ( 18 of 24)
68% ( 17 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
32% ( 8 of 25)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
30% ( 15 of 50)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 23 of 49)
58
Total Points Won
41
L
6-4 6-1 H2H
Rubber 1
W
7-6(8) 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Dalibor Svrcina
Player
Seongchan Hong
74% ( 55 of 74)
1st Serve %
55% ( 36 of 66)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
62% ( 34 of 55)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 20 of 36)
32% ( 6 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 12 of 30)
75% ( 6 of 8)
Break Points Won
40% ( 4 of 10)
46% ( 34 of 74)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 34 of 66)
74
Total Points Won
66
L
7-5 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Seongchan Hong
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
71% ( 80 of 112)
1st Serve %
70% ( 67 of 96)
11
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
64% ( 51 of 80)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 46 of 67)
50% ( 16 of 32)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 11 of 29)
60% ( 6 of 10)
Break Points Won
33% ( 4 of 12)
40% ( 45 of 112)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 39 of 96)
106
Total Points Won
102
W
6-7(2) 6-4 6-4 H2H
SF
cross
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Seongchan Hong
64% ( 49 of 77)
1st Serve %
58% ( 49 of 84)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
4
82% ( 40 of 49)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 34 of 49)
57% ( 16 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 15 of 35)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
27% ( 21 of 77)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 35 of 84)
91
Total Points Won
70
L
6-3 6-7(6) 4-0 ret. H2H
QF
cross
Seongchan Hong
Player
Fajing Sun
51% ( 52 of 101)
1st Serve %
52% ( 46 of 89)
10
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
65% ( 34 of 52)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 29 of 46)
63% ( 31 of 49)
2nd Serve Won
49% ( 21 of 43)
45% ( 5 of 11)
Break Points Won
20% ( 2 of 10)
36% ( 36 of 101)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 39 of 89)
104
Total Points Won
86
W
5-7 6-2 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Seongchan Hong
Player
Yan Bai
49% ( 21 of 43)
1st Serve %
56% ( 22 of 39)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
81% ( 17 of 21)
1st Serve Won
55% ( 12 of 22)
73% ( 16 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
35% ( 6 of 17)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 3)
23% ( 10 of 43)
Rtn Points Won
54% ( 21 of 39)
54
Total Points Won
28
W
6-2 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Seongchan Hong
Player
Evgeny Donskoy
56% ( 62 of 111)
1st Serve %
51% ( 49 of 96)
6
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
2
66% ( 41 of 62)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 30 of 49)
57% ( 28 of 49)
2nd Serve Won
55% ( 26 of 47)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
30% ( 3 of 10)
38% ( 42 of 111)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 40 of 96)
109
Total Points Won
98
W
4-6 7-6(1) 6-2 H2H

Where To Watch Ilkel vs Hong?

When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Ilkel Vs Hong is now available here.

banner

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Ilkel & Hong Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Cem Ilkel Ilkel Stats Seongchan Hong Hong
57% (434/333) Win/Loss 62% (265/162)
55% (970/804) Sets Win/Loss 60% (593/402)
52% (8701/8179) Games Win/Loss 54% (4942/4208)
0.34 Aces Per Game 0.31
2819 Aces Total 1390
0.17 Double Faults Per Game 0.17
1375 Total Double Faults 769
1:14:51 Average Match Time 1:33:38
531.78 Average Opponent Rank 481.34
58% (23808/40754) 1st Serve % 61% (16090/26209)
70% (16743/23808) 1st Serve Win % 68% (10879/16061)
51% (8644/16946) 2nd Serve Win % 52% (5253/10147)
40% (1608/3978) Break Points Won % (Total) 47% (1318/2834)
39% (16047/41231) Return Points Win % 42% (11062/26172)
56% (422/748) Best of 3 Sets Win % 63% (257/411)
40% (4/10) Best of 5 Sets Win % 40% (4/10)
54% (146/272) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 60% (60/100)
56% (129/231) Deciding Set Win % 55% (73/133)
85% (421/359) 1st Set Won, Won Match 84% (269/227)
14% (421/60) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 15% (269/41)
21% (345/73) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 24% (157/37)

Other Predictions

Tallahassee Challenger

flag
19 Apr
flag
22:00
Prediction

San Luis Potosi Challenger

flag
20 Apr
flag
03:30
Prediction

Gwangju Challenger

flag
flag
Prediction

Gwangju Challenger

flag
flag
Prediction

Gwangju Challenger

flag
flag
Prediction
  • Loading news...